DOUGLAS ASSOCIATION FOR RETIRED CITIZENS (DARC)

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED TRAINING & SENIOR MEALS PROGRAM

DOUGLAS, ARIZONA

 

Contact Person:  Gary Clark, Executive Director­Douglas ARC

P.O. Box 252

Douglas, Arizona 85608

Phone: (520)364-7473

 

COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION

 

Douglas, Arizona is a community with a population of approximately 14,500 persons and is located in the southeastern corner of Cochise County.  The Mexican border is only nine blocks from the offices of the Douglas Association for Retarded Citizens (Douglas ARC).

 

Douglas is a town born of the mining industry.  Ore mined in Bisbee, Arizona was transported to Douglas for smelting.  When the smelting operation was closed in 1985, the community of Douglas suffered. Today, 23 percent of the population of Douglas remains unemployed. 

 

BACKGROUND HISTORY

 

The Douglas Association of Retarded Children  (DARC) was established in 1958 as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.  Historically, programs for the developmentally disabled (DD) tended to center around craft projects.  The Executive Director of DARC became concerned that such skills were not enabling DD clients to find independent employment and become less dependent on public assistance.  He wanted to provide the opportunity for DD clients to gain self-esteem and a sense of value that comes from being gainfully employed, so he initiated a project to train DD clients in landscaping skills.

 

Although landscaping provided job opportunities for some of the DD clients, not all clients viewed this work alternative favorably.  Landscaping requires heavy manual labor and is conducted almost exclusively outdoors.  This made landscaping less acceptable to some of the female DD clients and inappropriate for those with certain health conditions.  It became apparent that if DD clients were to enter the public workplace as employable citizens, the skills being taught needed to be acceptable to all.  Since  the goal was to provide all capable DD clients job training in order to reduce dependence on public assistance and to facilitate entry into the public workforce, additional avenues of job training had to be explored.

 

PROJECT INITIATIVE

 

Collaboration

 

The Executive Director of DARC began to search for other training options and discovered an opportunity within a social service agency in the community.  Catholic Social Services provides a daily noon meal for seniors living in the community of Douglas.  When the Director of Catholic Social Services expressed a willingness to employ DD clients trained in preparing, serving and delivering meals to seniors, a new training program took shape.  DD clients would be trained to prepare and serve meals to seniors at the congregate meal site and assist in the delivery of meals to homebound elderly persons.  This was an unprecedented collaborative effort between two nonprofit service organizations. 

 

In order to successfully initiate this project, DARC found it vital to establish an open dialogue and positive rapport with the county health department.  Very specific guidelines, established by the county health department, had to be met in the training of clients to provide meals to seniors.  Each DD client eligible for training had to pass four written tests in addition to being trained in preparing, serving and delivering meals. 

 

The need for written tests presented a major obstacle, since some of the DD clients could neither read nor write and some were nonverbal.  It was virtually impossible to accurately assess their  knowledge using the established testing mechanisms employed by the county health department.  Working closely with county health department officials, the Director of DARC was allowed to review the four tests and condense them into a set of 40 questions that could be an­­­swered with “yes” or “no” responses.  The condensed, modified test was administered one-on-one verbally to DD clients.  The county health department also found the condensed test  and the response format to be useful in assessing the knowledge of non-English speaking individuals. Today, the department uses the condensed questions for testing both DD and non-English speaking people for food handling.

 

Locating a Facility

 

In the early phases of this project, meals were prepared and served in the Catholic Youth Center facility, which had a gym and kitchen. Because the facility and kitchen utensils were borrowed, the program had no start-up costs.  Forty meals a day were provided to elderly community members at this congregate meal site.

 

Over the following two years, the meal program, along with the training program for DD clients, moved to various churches in the community.  The county health department maintained a close association with both  programs and established an ongoing effort to help keep program standards high as locations changed. 

 

Eventually, it became necessary to establish a permanent, independent location for the meal and training program.  A vacant building in the downtown area of Douglas was chosen.  With funding assistance from a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and vocational rehabilitation funds, the building was renovated to meet county health department requirements.  A new kitchen and a walk-in freezer were included in the renovation. 

 

With a permanent location and a ten-year lease, the training and meal programs appeared to be off  to a good start.  However, after approximately one year, the building was sold.  The ten-year lease agreement was not honored by the new owner and the programs had to relocate immediately.  The Catholic Youth Center offered to house the programs for one year.  At that time, more than 100 meals a day were being prepared, served and delivered.

 

With the programs temporarily relocated in the Catholic Youth Center, the search began for a new facility.  Among the struc­tures considered was a building that had housed the local hospital.  The building, vacant for approximately 15 years, had been built by the Phelps-Dodge Mining Company. The company had constructed the hospital to serve the community during the time when the mining smelting operation was a major employer in the community.

 

The DARC Board of Directors decided to approach the mining company with an offer to buy the building.  DARC had a total of $10,000 to offer for the entire hospital complex. The mining company had stipulated that, for serious consideration, offers should be a minimum of $250,000 for the structure. Nevertheless, a proposal to purchase the building for $10,000 was submitted to the parent mining corporation.  Knowing their offer was far below the stated minimum amount that would be considered, the Board of Directors and Executive Director of DARC were astonished when informed by the mining company that the building was being donated to DARC, with the stipulation that it be used in the best interest of elderly and disabled members of the Douglas community.

 

FUNDING

 

After acquiring the hospital building, the next challenge was renovating the building to meet the requirements of the county health department.  To identify  potential funding sources for the renovation, the Executive Director of DARC used the local library to research philanthropic foundations that gave awards to organizations in Arizona.  A foundation in Ohio was among those found to award monies within the state.  An application was submitted and a $10,000 grant was awarded from the Ohio foundation.  However, before the foundation would forward the monies, it was stipulated by the foundation that additional matching monies had to be raised by DARC.  This stipulation posed a considerable challenge.

 

Three major fund-raising efforts were instrumental in reaching the match amount: 1) an Annual Mother's Day Cake Auction; 2) four bike races; and 3) a "Wall of Hope.”  The “Wall of Hope” was conceived as a way individuals born in the old hospital could contribute to its continued use and receive recognition for their efforts.  Individuals who had been born in the old hospital were contacted and given the opportunity to buy a brick for $100.  These bricks were used to build the “Wall of Hope” and plaques were inscribed with the names of the donors.

 

The fund-raising efforts brought in the required $10,000 match.  With the $10,000 DARC had available, the monies from the Ohio foundation, and the matching monies, a total of $30,000 was available for the renovations.

 

CHALLENGES

 

Skilled Labor

 

The $30,000 was not adequate to pay the skilled labor costs necessary to carry out the renovation of the old hospital building.  This challenge was also approached creatively.  Because Douglas is home to a minimum security prison, prison labor could serve as an affordable, available resource.  The major offense of most prisoners was a “driving under the influence” (DUI).  After reviewing the work histories of the prisoners, it became apparent they comprised a skilled labor force that could help to renovate the old hospital building.  The Douglas prison allowed prisoners to provide the labor for the renovation of one wing of the old hospital building.

 

HUD Regulations

 

In an effort to fund the renovation and conversion of another wing of the old hospital building into apartments, the director of  DARC, in collaboration with the Douglas Public Housing Authority, wrote a grant application for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME funding.  As a nonprofit organization, DARC had neither a credit line nor cash flow.  Partnership with the city provided a viable source of cash flow for the application.  The HUD application was processed and within four months the money was received.  However, there were stipulations regarding who could live in the apartments. 

 

In order to retain the funding and allow DARC some autonomy regarding occupancy, the HUD contract was researched.  It was found that the Davis-Bacon Act governed occupancy stipulations where more than eleven units were built using HUD monies.  However, if eleven units or fewer were constructed, they would not fall under the HUD requirements and monitoring.  Con­sequently,  the apartments were made larger and eleven units were built.  The occupancy criterion for the eleven apartments is determined by DARC.  Currently, six of those apartments provide housing for seniors. 

 

No longer a recipient of HUD monies, DARC has supplemented its funding through state funds as well as funds from the county lottery. 

 

POSITIVE OUTCOMES

 

The renovation process provided not only a new facility for housing and programs, but also resulted in other positive outcomes.  As the prisoners worked on the old hospital building, they became familiar with the DD and the elderly citizens who would benefit from their efforts.  Their work became more than labor.  A sense of purpose developed among the prisoners.  For example, those with artistic talents painted cartoon character scenes on the walls in the kitchen as a special touch for the DD workers who prepared meals each day. 

 

DARC held an award ceremony for prisoners when they were released.  Each prisoner received a framed certificate of appreciation, complete with hugs from clients and staff.  It was common to find prisoners who had worked on the renovation giving their families tours of the building.  As it became apparent that the prisoners were genuinely contributing to the betterment of the community, the community began to view the prisoners with less discomfort.

 

Earlier this year, DARC developed a new transportation program to serve the community's elderly population.  The program transports seniors to and from grocery stores and shopping centers, thus allowing seniors without available transportation the freedom to continue to shop for themselves. 

 

The DARC continues to provide training and employment for developmentally disabled individuals, in conjunction with nutrition services for the community’s elderly population.  Developmentally disabled clients prepare and serve more than 300 congregate meals daily as a part of the DARC training and meals program.  A home-delivered meal component has been implemented in the Communities of Bisbee and Douglas, with DD clients assisting in the delivery of more than 110 meals within one and a half hours each day. More than 50 of the DD clients who have participated in the training program have been successful in securing employment in private businesses in the community.

 

 

Return to Rural Service Models Index